How we review the content

You should be able to trust what you learn. Every claim that rests on external facts is linked to an official source, and we check the material on a regular schedule.

Review dates

Last checked:
September 19, 2026
Next scheduled review:
December 19, 2026

Our principles

  • ✓We prioritize official product documentation, public authorities, EU law, and established standards and security bodies.
  • ✓Each external source is linked to the sections and claims it actually supports.
  • ✓Our own examples, exercises, calculations, and teaching models are labeled as editorial material.
  • ✓We never claim that the courses are approved, certified, or recommended by the source organizations.
  • ✓Feature-dependent material is checked at least every three months and after major product or regulatory changes.
  • ✓A dated change log shows what was checked and what was updated.

What the review covers

  • ·That tool features and interfaces still work the way the course describes.
  • ·That every source link leads to the intended official page.
  • ·That security and risk content matches relevant standards and authority sources.
  • ·That practical exercises work on desktop and mobile.
  • ·That wording, instructions, and answer options are clear in Swedish, English, and Spanish.

Organizations we check against

Names are shown as text. We use no logos, and none of these organizations endorses the courses.

  • OpenAI
  • Anthropic
  • n8n
  • NIST
  • OWASP GenAI Security Project
  • Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY)
  • European Commission
  • European Union
  • Make
  • Model Context Protocol
  • Google Search Central
  • AI Sweden
  • Shopify
  • WooCommerce
  • Google Merchant Center
  • Sveriges riksdag
  • W3C WAI
  • Meta
  • LinkedIn
  • TikTok for Business
  • GitHub
  • W3C Web Accessibility Initiative
  • MDN Web Docs

How you learn in our courses

Our courses are built on four principles that research shows work. The goal is for you to use what you learn in your work right away – not just recognize it.

  • You do, not just read

    In every course you work through exercises based on your own situation instead of only reading.

    The research: In a review of 225 studies, active learning led to better exam results, and students in traditional lectures were 1.5 times more likely to fail. (Freeman et al., PNAS 2014)

  • You test yourself and get instant feedback

    Check questions with explanations and a knowledge test at the end.

    The research: Retrieving knowledge from memory leads to better retention than rereading – especially with feedback. (Rowland, Psychological Bulletin 2014; Dunlosky et al. 2013)

  • Short parts in a clear order

    The material is split into short parts you take at your own pace, and you always see where you are.

    The research: Breaking new material into smaller segments is a well-established principle for learning on screen. (Mayer, Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning)

  • Concrete examples to learn from

    Realistic example businesses, ready-made instructions, and model answers to compare with.

    The research: Beginners learn more from studying worked examples than from solving everything on their own from the start (the worked-example effect, Sweller).

What we don't claim

The studies were carried out in other settings, often at universities, and measure better results – not exactly how much time you save. That is why we make no promises about how fast you will learn, only that our courses are built on what research shows works.

The source information is not legal advice and does not mean that any external organization has approved or certified the course. Always check your organization’s rules and the current requirements for your own use case.