How we review the content

You should be able to trust what you learn. Every claim that rests on external facts is linked to an official source, and we check the material on a regular schedule.

Our principles

• ✓We prioritise official product documentation, public authorities, EU law and established standards and security bodies.
• ✓Each external source is linked to the sections and claims it actually supports.
• ✓Our own examples, exercises, calculations and teaching models are labelled as editorial material.
• ✓We never claim that the courses are approved, certified or recommended by the source organisations.
• ✓Feature-dependent material is checked at least every three months and after major product or regulatory changes.
• ✓A dated change log shows what was checked and what was updated.

What the review covers

• ·That tool features and interfaces still work the way the course describes.
• ·That every source link leads to the intended official page.
• ·That security and risk content matches relevant standards and authority sources.
• ·That practical exercises work on desktop and mobile.
• ·That wording, instructions and answer options are clear in Swedish, English and Spanish.

Organisations we review against

Names are shown as text. We use no logos, and none of these organisations stands behind the training.

• OpenAI
• Anthropic
• NIST
• OWASP GenAI Security Project
• Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY)
• European Commission
• European Union
• Make
• n8n

The source information is not legal advice and does not mean that any external organisation has approved or certified the course. Always check your organisation’s rules and the current requirements for your own use case.