Agent library

Agent ideas for real work

Every idea shows what the agent does, what material it needs and where a person reviews the result. Three recipes are shown in full; the rest are included in their course.

Three complete samples

EmployeesMedium.· 40 minutes.

Quality reviewer

Review a deliverable against the organisation’s criteria and support every finding.

  • Use when: the task recurs, the material is bounded, and a person can review the result.
  • Do not use for: automated decisions with legal, medical, financial, or employment consequences.
  • Approved input: the text to review, approved criteria, examples, and sources.
  • Expected output: errors, improvement suggestions, uncertainties, and references to the relevant criterion.
  • Human checkpoint: the accountable person decides which changes to apply.
  • Risk level: Medium.
  • Estimated build time: 40 minutes.
  • Maintenance: Quarterly.

Build it this way

  1. Create a bounded project in ChatGPT or Claude.
  2. Add the purpose, audience, and recipe instruction.
  3. Upload approved sources only and label them with dates.
  4. Add one good example and one example that should fail.
  5. Run the five tests and document deviations.
  6. Assign an owner, checkpoint, and next review date.

Copyable instruction

ROLE
You are quality reviewer.

TASK
Review a deliverable against the organisation’s criteria and support every finding.

APPROVED MATERIAL
the text to review, approved criteria, examples, and sources.

WORK STEPS
1. Check that the material is sufficient.
2. Separate facts from assumptions.
3. Complete the task step by step.
4. Refer to the relevant material.
5. Mark uncertainty and propose the next check.

RESPONSE FORMAT
errors, improvement suggestions, uncertainties, and references to the relevant criterion.

UNCERTAINTY AND BOUNDARIES
Use approved material only. Do not invent facts. Mark missing information and uncertainty. A person reviews the result before it is used, sent, or affects anyone else.

Five test cases

Test caseExpected result
Standard caseCorrect structure and substantiated information only.
Critical information is missingAsks for what is missing and stops when required.
Conflicting source materialReports the conflict without choosing a source independently.
Sensitive or prohibited informationMinimises the information and follows the stop rule.
Request outside the scopeDeclines or narrows the request and refers to the scope.

Acceptance criteria

  • Use approved material only. Do not invent facts. Mark missing information and uncertainty.
  • The accountable person decides which changes to apply.
  • All five tests are documented; blocking errors are resolved before the pilot.

Measure after the pilot

  • Accuracy, false positives, and time per review.
  • Share of results approved without major rework.
  • Error types and number of stopped results.

Source principle: Official guidance for projects, instructions, and files is listed in the sources. Features can depend on the plan and workspace settings.

Solo entrepreneursMedium.· 35 minutes.

Customer brief assistant

Turn an initial customer conversation into a complete brief with goals, scope, questions, and assumptions.

  • Use when: the task recurs, the material is bounded, and a person can review the result.
  • Do not use for: automated decisions with legal, medical, financial, or employment consequences.
  • Approved input: customer need, approved offering, pricing material, constraints, and previous contact.
  • Expected output: questions to ask, a tailored draft, and clearly marked assumptions.
  • Human checkpoint: the salesperson confirms scope, price, promises, and commercial terms.
  • Risk level: Medium.
  • Estimated build time: 35 minutes.
  • Maintenance: Quarterly.

Build it this way

  1. Create a bounded project in ChatGPT or Claude.
  2. Add the purpose, audience, and recipe instruction.
  3. Upload approved sources only and label them with dates.
  4. Add one good example and one example that should fail.
  5. Run the five tests and document deviations.
  6. Assign an owner, checkpoint, and next review date.

Copyable instruction

ROLE
You are customer brief assistant.

TASK
Turn an initial customer conversation into a complete brief with goals, scope, questions, and assumptions.

APPROVED MATERIAL
customer need, approved offering, pricing material, constraints, and previous contact.

WORK STEPS
1. Check that the material is sufficient.
2. Separate facts from assumptions.
3. Complete the task step by step.
4. Refer to the relevant material.
5. Mark uncertainty and propose the next check.

RESPONSE FORMAT
questions to ask, a tailored draft, and clearly marked assumptions.

UNCERTAINTY AND BOUNDARIES
Use approved material only. Do not invent facts. Mark missing information and uncertainty. A person reviews the result before it is used, sent, or affects anyone else.

Five test cases

Test caseExpected result
Standard caseCorrect structure and substantiated information only.
Critical information is missingAsks for what is missing and stops when required.
Conflicting source materialReports the conflict without choosing a source independently.
Sensitive or prohibited informationMinimises the information and follows the stop rule.
Request outside the scopeDeclines or narrows the request and refers to the scope.

Acceptance criteria

  • Use approved material only. Do not invent facts. Mark missing information and uncertainty.
  • The salesperson confirms scope, price, promises, and commercial terms.
  • All five tests are documented; blocking errors are resolved before the pilot.

Measure after the pilot

  • Time to draft, corrections, and share of complete customer briefs.
  • Share of results approved without major rework.
  • Error types and number of stopped results.

Source principle: Official guidance for projects, instructions, and files is listed in the sources. Features can depend on the plan and workspace settings.

Meetings and follow-upMedium.· 35 minutes.

Operational weekly meeting agent

Make the weekly meeting actionable through decisions, owners, blockers, dependencies, and next review.

  • Use when: the task recurs, the material is bounded, and a person can review the result.
  • Do not use for: automated decisions with legal, medical, financial, or employment consequences.
  • Approved input: meeting notes, agenda, participant list, and approved templates.
  • Expected output: decisions, actions, owners, dates, open questions, and uncertainties in a fixed structure.
  • Human checkpoint: the meeting chair verifies decisions, owners, and dates against the original notes.
  • Risk level: Medium.
  • Estimated build time: 35 minutes.
  • Maintenance: Quarterly.

Build it this way

  1. Create a bounded project in ChatGPT or Claude.
  2. Add the purpose, audience, and recipe instruction.
  3. Upload approved sources only and label them with dates.
  4. Add one good example and one example that should fail.
  5. Run the five tests and document deviations.
  6. Assign an owner, checkpoint, and next review date.

Copyable instruction

ROLE
You are operational weekly meeting agent.

TASK
Make the weekly meeting actionable through decisions, owners, blockers, dependencies, and next review.

APPROVED MATERIAL
meeting notes, agenda, participant list, and approved templates.

WORK STEPS
1. Check that the material is sufficient.
2. Separate facts from assumptions.
3. Complete the task step by step.
4. Refer to the relevant material.
5. Mark uncertainty and propose the next check.

RESPONSE FORMAT
decisions, actions, owners, dates, open questions, and uncertainties in a fixed structure.

UNCERTAINTY AND BOUNDARIES
Use approved material only. Do not invent facts. Mark missing information and uncertainty. A person reviews the result before it is used, sent, or affects anyone else.

Five test cases

Test caseExpected result
Standard caseCorrect structure and substantiated information only.
Critical information is missingAsks for what is missing and stops when required.
Conflicting source materialReports the conflict without choosing a source independently.
Sensitive or prohibited informationMinimises the information and follows the stop rule.
Request outside the scopeDeclines or narrows the request and refers to the scope.

Acceptance criteria

  • Use approved material only. Do not invent facts. Mark missing information and uncertainty.
  • The meeting chair verifies decisions, owners, and dates against the original notes.
  • All five tests are documented; blocking errors are resolved before the pilot.

Measure after the pilot

  • Share of correct decisions and minutes saved per meeting.
  • Share of results approved without major rework.
  • Error types and number of stopped results.

Source principle: Official guidance for projects, instructions, and files is listed in the sources. Features can depend on the plan and workspace settings.

Ideas to explore

Audience
Work area
Risk level
Build time
Tool level

80 ideas